← Back to blog

The FedEx Cup and the Playoffs

When the FedEx Cup was launched in 2007, it represented the most ambitious structural change to the PGA Tour season in decades. The concept was straightforward on the surface: award points throughout the season, hold a playoff series at the end, and crown a champion who had proven himself over months of competition rather than a single week. The reality has been more complicated — the format has been revised multiple times as the Tour has tried to balance competitive integrity, television appeal, and the interests of a field of players who each have their own view of what the season should mean.

The Season-Long Points Race

FedEx Cup points are awarded at every PGA Tour event throughout the season, which runs from September through August. The allocation is weighted heavily toward the major championships and the biggest events on the calendar — a winner at The Players Championship, which carries the largest field points allocation of any non-major, earns 750 points, while a victory at a standard Signature Event earns 500. The four major championships each carry 600 points for the winner.

Points are distributed well down the field at every event, which means a player who misses the cut collects nothing but a player who finishes fortieth still adds something to his tally. The cumulative nature of the system rewards consistency: a player who posts ten top-twenty finishes over a full season will typically rank higher than one who wins once and misses cuts frequently. Whether that reflects the right kind of competitive excellence has been debated since the Cup's inception.

The number of players competing on the tour and the sheer length of the season — more than forty events before the playoffs begin — means that the standings at the end of the regular season can involve well over a hundred players who have all accumulated meaningful points totals.

The Playoff Structure

The FedEx Cup Playoffs have undergone their most significant revision in the format that was introduced for the 2019 season and refined further since. The current structure consists of three events.

The first playoff event is the FedEx St. Jude Championship, played at TPC Southwind in Memphis, Tennessee. The top 70 players in the FedEx Cup standings at the start of the playoffs qualify to play. After the event, the field is cut to 50 players based on updated standings.

The second event is the BMW Championship, played at a rotating venue — Olympia Fields, Caves Valley, and Wilmington Country Club have all hosted in recent years. The field of 50 is reduced to 30 for the Tour Championship.

The Tour Championship is played at East Lake Golf Club in Atlanta, Georgia — the oldest course in the city, founded in 1904, and the club where Bobby Jones grew up playing. East Lake is a fitting venue for the season's climax, with its parkland layout, subtle green complexes, and a rich competitive history.

The Staggered Start System

The most controversial element of the current FedEx Cup format is the staggered starting score that was introduced in 2019 and refined in 2020. Rather than beginning the Tour Championship at even par for all 30 players, each player starts with a score that reflects his standing in the FedEx Cup points race. The player who enters ranked first starts at ten under par. The player ranked second starts at eight under. The scale descends to even par for the player ranked 26th through 30th.

The effect is to make the final-round leaderboard reflect both the week's performance and the season-long points race simultaneously. A player who enters the Tour Championship ranked first can afford to play aggressively because he has a buffer; the player ranked 30th must play near-perfect golf to have any chance of winning.

The system has its critics. Players and commentators have argued that it distorts the competitive picture — it is theoretically possible, though extremely unlikely, for a player ranked first entering the Tour Championship to win the FedEx Cup without winning the event itself. The counterargument is that it does exactly what the system promises: it ensures the season-long leader has a genuine advantage in the final event, rather than having a full season of consistency erased by a single bad week.

The Prize Money

The FedEx Cup bonus pool has grown substantially since 2007. The total package now exceeds sixty million dollars. The winner of the FedEx Cup receives a bonus of eighteen million dollars — a figure that has made several players multi-millionaires in a single evening. Bonuses are distributed to players finishing in the top thirty, with the scale descending significantly below the top few places.

That prize money structure has had an unintended consequence: it creates a cliff-edge of motivation within the season. Players who have already qualified comfortably for the playoffs have less incentive to post themselves into the top twenty in the regular-season standings when the difference in bonus money between, say, fifth and twenty-fifth is modest compared to the difference between making the Tour Championship and missing it.

Criticism and Debate

The FedEx Cup has never been without controversy. The original format, introduced in 2007, used a points-reset mechanism that meant a player could theoretically enter the Tour Championship needing only a top-five finish to win the FedEx Cup regardless of their season-long performance. Tiger Woods won the 2007 FedEx Cup under those rules despite not winning the Tour Championship itself, which created immediate calls for reform.

The staggered-start system has addressed the most glaring fairness issues, but a fundamental question remains unresolved: is a season-long points race followed by a four-event playoff really a coherent championship format, or is it a television construct that imposes artificial drama onto what should be a cumulative athletic achievement? Open the map to find courses including those that have hosted FedEx Cup playoff events.

Defenders of the format point to the attendances and television ratings the playoff events generate, and to the genuine excitement that the staggered-start Tour Championship has produced in recent years. Rory McIlroy, who has won the FedEx Cup multiple times, has been among its most enthusiastic supporters, arguing that it gives American golf a season-long narrative that can compete with professional football and basketball for casual viewers. That argument has merit — the question is whether the competitive architecture matches the marketing ambition.